Thursday, October 30, 2025
We already accept that we can vote only where we are registered, so why do we allow campaign contributions from people and entities who can't vote where we are registered?
... Here's a reform that would change everything: You can only donate to candidates and political organizations in the state where you are registered to vote.
Not where you own property. Not where you have business interests. Not where you "care deeply" about the issues. Where you are registered to vote – the place where you've committed to being a citizen and living with the consequences of governance.
This single rule would fundamentally reshape American politics.
... Change the incentives by changing where the money comes from, and you change what kind of people can succeed in politics – and what kind of Congress they create.
It's time to return politics to the people who actually have to live with the results.
Lindsay Mark Lewis, here.
Wednesday, October 29, 2025
Who needs to run if elections are suspended in yet another phony national emergency?
Trump is not allowed to stop spending money which was lawfully appropriated by the Congress for specific purposes, or to spend it on other things, but that's exactly what he's doing anyway.
He's illegally taxing every American with his tariffs under a phony emergency power granted him by our servile Congress.
He's not allowed to shake down and detain citizens on the pretext that they may be illegally present, but that's exactly what he's done. He's made a mockery of citizenship.
He's not allowed to search without a warrant, but he's doing it anyway. You let him do it every time you fly, so what's the big deal if now he's invading homes and businesses without warrants in search of illegal aliens? You don't care.
He uses his bully pulpit literally to bully people, to suppress their speech. He threatens investigations of his opponents, and makes good on them with actual probes and charges. Some in Congress admit they are afraid of him.
No one made him the judge, jury, and executioner, but that's who he thinks he is. He is in fact murdering non-combatants pure and simple every day, and Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio are his accomplices, as is the U.S. military, to its everlasting shame.
Trump is the greatest . . . violator of civil rights and the rule of law since Lincoln.
He's made an ass of the law.
He's flooded the zone with illegality, impropriety, personal corruption, crime, and ugliness.
And Congress just lets him. The courts just let him. The people just let him.
They all just shrug. They're the French, and he's their Napoleon.
Friday, October 24, 2025
Wednesday, October 22, 2025
Thursday, October 16, 2025
Sunday, October 12, 2025
Thursday, October 9, 2025
Wednesday, October 8, 2025
Senator Ron Johnson squeals like a pig for the Gang of Nine
... none of us were ... targets of this investigation. There's no predicate. ...
Ha ha ha.
Here.
Johnson is not telling the truth about his role in the fake elector scheme.
Friday, October 3, 2025
Tuesday, September 16, 2025
Do you not see what's happening here? The Trump administration is declaring everything it doesn't like to be terrorism in order to justify autocratic repression of it using the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force
The run of the mill narco smugglers from Venezuela suddenly are terrorists under Trump, so they blow them up.
Suddenly the left wing Charlie Kirk critics are being transformed into terrorists, too, so they say they will also destroy them.
Who's next? Where will it end?
J. D. Vance once wanted to stop this underlying basis for neo-con adventurism. Now the chameleon is part of its expansion to include unconstitutional domestic repression.
These people must be stopped.
Thursday, September 11, 2025
There's a lot of BS and fear-mongering being circulated about the preliminary total nonfarm payrolls benchmark revision of -911,000 from two days ago
It all betrays an inability to think.
Bloomberg here said:
... The number of workers on payrolls will likely be revised down by a record 911,000, or 0.6%, according to the government’s preliminary benchmark revision out Tuesday. The final figures are due early next year. ...
No, it's not at all likely.
It's a preliminary number for crying out loud, the size of which reflects more on the increasing difficulty BLS is having gathering the monthly data in more or less real time than it does on the data itself.
Bloomberg then followed that up with a scary chart of previous preliminary benchmark revision estimates, as if those represented reality, too. And then people who should know better repeated the scary chart.
This story went particularly hysterical about it: The BLS Hallucinated a Million Jobs. The Fed Can't Fix This.
But we've known since February what the BLS really thinks the final numbers are, in thousands, and all these irresponsible sources just leave that out, because . . . clicks:
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Monday, September 8, 2025
Treasury Secretary Bessent tells a whopper
Saturday, August 30, 2025
Real Clear Politics rewrites headlines to make Trump look better
Appeals Court Rules Against Some Tariffs But Leaves Them in Place takes you to Most Trump tariffs are not legal, US appeals court rules lol.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/most-trump-tariffs-are-not-legal-us-appeals-court-rules/ar-AA1LvGU7
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/most-trump-tariffs-are-not-legal-us-appeals-court-rules-2025-08-30/
Thursday, August 7, 2025
The Treasury Secretary is such a kiss-ass and knows damn well that the Fed's so-called full employment mandate was a set of handcuffs put on the Fed in 1978
And why did the Congress do that to the Fed?
So the Congress could evade responsibility for high unemployment as well as for high inflation, that's why.
A bunch of cowards six ways to Sunday they are.
Besides, core personal consumption expenditures is the Fed's key metric, as everyone knows, and that is an inflation metric, not an employment metric.
And The Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act specifically recognizes that reducing inflation is the Fed's main job, actually mandating ZERO inflation, not 2% inflation as widely misinterpreted.
Meanwhile there is another report of employment besides the total non-farm payrolls report which the Fed can consult, and it shows employment continues near all-time highs in July.
No change to DFF was the appropriate response of the Fed to persistent core inflation way above 2%.






















