Showing posts with label Inigo Montoya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inigo Montoya. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 4, 2023
Thursday, June 1, 2023
Friday, December 18, 2015
Gay columnist featured at Breitbart sneers at farcical hetero cult romance
The Princess Bride:
"The only interesting part of the entire movie is the inexplicable sexual energy in the ensuing duel between the Spaniard, Inigo Montoya, and Westley. There’s plenty of winking, lingering glances, and talking about favoured hands. Westley, sensing the presence of his soulmate, refuses to kill the Spaniard swordsman. Either that, or the hideous perm softened the blow he struck to the man’s curly head. ... Speaking for myself, the only way I got through the movie was fantasising about Inigo and Westley finally realizing that Buttercup wasn’t worth the effort, and going off to, err, cross swords again in private."
For some reason Milo Yiannopoulos decided it was time to review a twenty-eight year old movie, here. He was what, three when it came out? How old was he when he came out? The excuse given was something Lindsey Graham said, which should tell you who gets Milo's blood pumping, and why. Milo's Wikipedia entry describes him as a "gay Catholic".
Some people just don't fit into Western society, whether they live in San Bernardino, Manchester or Cambridge.
Labels:
Breitbart,
Catholic,
Inigo Montoya,
Lindsey Graham,
Milo Yiannopoulos
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Rush Limbaugh Today Totally Botches Income Quintiles On The Program
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
The relevant passage is here:
Poverty is expressed as an income level. Most economists break down income in America to five brackets, called quintiles, and people move in and out of these. The top quintile, I think, is like a million plus, and that'd be the top 1% of 1%. I forgot what the breakdown is, but the poverty level, it's roughly, what, $14,000 for a family of four? It's around there. People move in and out of these all the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is rich.
A quintile in this instance is one of any of the five groups of American households divided into those five groups based on how much money they make.
By definition, then, the top quintile is the richest 20% of households in America. So it's impossible for the top quintile to be "the top 1%", let alone "the top 1% of 1%".
As embarrassing as that is, Rush has absolutely no concept what it means to reach the top 20% of household income in this country.
The fact is it doesn't take all that much, and certainly nothing close to $1 million, hard as it may be to get there.
Currently the point in the middle of the top 20% of households by income is only about $181,905 per annum. That means about half the people in the top quintile make more than that, and about half make less. And interestingly enough, the middle of the richest 5% of households in this country isn't anywhere close to $1 million, either. The average household income of the top 5% is just $318,052. (For a good presentation of the data, see here.)
And Rush is equally out of touch about what it means to be poor. The federal definition for a family of four is about $23,500, not $14,000. The latter is about what it means for just one person to be poor, not four (see here).
Rush Limbaugh complains constantly about the sorry state of public education in this country. He even did so today in the same segment:
[L]ook at [President] Johnson's solutions. Education, job training, medical care, housing. That hasn't changed. The same weapons, the same language, the same way they tug at heartstrings. It's 1964, and they keep using the same lingo, obviously because it works. But look at how our education system's been since 1964 with them in charge.
Yep. Look at how it's been.
Rush is Exhibit A . . . the most popular radio host ever for a reason.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)