Showing posts with label Alexander Vindman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alexander Vindman. Show all posts

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Monday, December 16, 2019

Apparently it took the Army a whole year to get rid of this guy, but Vindman, sheesh

I love how my New Oxford American Dictionary comes up with it right away when I forget how to spell "Che Guevara".

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Vindman lied again: Said his boss Morrison was not available to report his concerns, but Morrison says he got edits to the Ukraine call from Vindman the very same day

That means Vindman by-passed his boss. Looks like following chain of command is only aspirational with Vindman.

Vindman is so important in his own mind that he's testified Ukraine asked him three times in 2019 to be THEIR Defense Minister

Ukraine must think Vindman is more Ukrainian than American.

Now why would they think that?

Vindman, who claims to be the president's principal adviser on Ukraine, admitted today he has never spoken to the president

What a self-important gasbag.

It's not just a coup against Trump, it's a military coup, led by Col. Muammar Vindman


Vindman is a disgrace: Lock him up


Vindman is joined in his lies to Congress by Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff


Vindman is lying through his teeth: How would he know telling the name of the second person he talked to would out the whistleblower unless he knows the whistleblower's identity?


Vindman lawyer blew it: Vindman leaked to the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella


Rush led off with this today: Vindman is the leaker, meaning he ignored chain of command (Morrison)


Arrogant prick Vindman does Al Haig: I'm in control here at the White House


Vindman does Fredo like Dr. Jill Biden: I'm IMPORRRRRTANT see, that's Lt. Col. Vindman

Just call him "the witness".

Monday, November 18, 2019

Transcripts of depositions before Democrat Adam Schiff's committee show example after example of halting questioning which might lead to origins of investigation

But so far at least, the investigation seems to have established that Trump's alleged misconduct exists in the eye of the beholder. Some officials heard the Zelensky call as it happened and saw no wrongdoing. Vindman, on the other hand, saw wrongdoing and got in touch with an unknown number of people about it. After that, the story grew and grew. How did one man's impression turn into the impeachment probe of today?

And that is what Chairman Schiff does not want the nation to know.

More here.

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Transcript of Vindman Ukraine call testimony shows he offered no new facts, deemed transcript released by Trump "very accurate"

[T]he Vindman transcript also showed a witness whose testimony was filled with opinion, with impressions, who had little new to offer, who withheld important information from the committee, who was steeped in a bureaucracy that has often been hostile to the president, and whose lawyer, presumably with Vindman's approval, expressed unmistakable disdain, verging on contempt, for members of Congress who asked inconvenient questions. In short, Vindman's testimony was not the slam-dunk hit Democrats portrayed it to be. ...

Now, parts of the foreign policy bureaucracy are in open war with the president, channeling their grievances through the House Democrats' drive toward impeachment. When he testifies in public, Vindman will be the living embodiment of that bureaucratic war.

More here.