At TheHill, where else?
Let's stop saying 'breakthrough cases' — it isn't helping
When the vaccine was introduced, Dr. Anthony Fauci and others said it would offer the public a strong layer of protection
against COVID-19. They sought to manage expectations by saying it would
lower the possibility of getting the virus, but that, like all
vaccines, it wouldn’t guarantee immunity. They tried to make it clear
that infection was still possible, and that the vaccine would still do
its job by drastically lowering the chance of severe illness,
hospitalization and death. All of this has proven true.
By trumpeting the term “breakthrough cases,” public health authorities
are spreading the impression that these infections are novel, unique and
unanticipated by the scientific community. In fact, the vaccine was
designed precisely with this likelihood in mind, and it is working
exactly as intended.
Yeah, right. That's why Fauci said on at least three separate occasions before Delta hit that vaccination levels hitting 50% of population would prevent additional case surges like we saw in April 2021. He was sure after that that the steep declines in cases we saw nationally were a sign that the vaccines were working.
And then along came the July 4th, Provincetown, incident, proving vaccines didn't stop the spread, and Delta, proving him even more horribly wrong.
The shift to "it prevents serious illness, hospitalization and death" was . . . a shift!
But even that hasn't been true. Mass vaccination has not reduced either cases or deaths Jul-Dec 2021 compared with Jul-Dec 2020.
These people are just awful, deplorable even, because they keep touting a vaccine which isn't a true vaccine, and because of it vaccinated people have been running around spreading serious illness, hospitalization and death.
Words have meaning. Censoring them won't stop the death toll.
