Another disappointing performance by Tulsi Gabbard.
Tulsi, former leftist, keeps proving she can turn with the wind with the best of them.
And I had such high hopes for her. đ¤ˇ
Another disappointing performance by Tulsi Gabbard.
Tulsi, former leftist, keeps proving she can turn with the wind with the best of them.
And I had such high hopes for her. đ¤ˇ
The White Houseâs push for for expanded presidential power threatens US economic stability
Donald Trump is systematically purging every US government institution, a pattern familiar to anybody who has studied the caudillo regimes of Latin America, or the playbook of todayâs Putin-OrbĂĄn-ErdoÄan prototypes.
It is a racing certainty that he will soon do the same to the Federal Reserve, forcing the central bank to cut interest rates into the teeth of rising inflation, with epic consequences for the worldâs dollarised financial system and for âŹ39 trillion (ÂŁ33 trillion) of offshore dollar debt contracts and swaps.
Late last week he fired the head of the National Security Agency and its top officials at the behest of Laura Loomer, a fringe conspiracy theorist, who whispered into Trumpâs ear that they were disloyal to the Maga movement.
He has already fired the heads of the FBIâs intelligence division, its counterterrorism division and criminal investigations division, as well as the heads of the Washington and New York offices.
He has fired the top brass of the US military, starting with a preemptive strike on the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. An earlier chairman â General Mark Milley â refused to ratify Trumpâs attempted coup dâetat on Jan 6 2021.
âWe donât take an oath to a king, or to a tyrant or dictator, and we donât take an oath to a wannabe dictator. We take an oath to the constitution,â said Milley in his parting shot.
But Trump also fired the three judge advocates general, who are legally independent by Congressional statute and have the authority to decide which military orders should be disobeyed â such as Trumpâs order to âjust shootâ American protesters, on American soil, during the Black Lives Matter saga.
That obstacle will not recur. Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, said the three judges had been sacked to stop them posing any âroadblocks to orders given by the commander-in-chiefâ.
You can go through the list, agency by agency, extending to the universities and private law firms, and even to the muzzled editorials of some of Americaâs once great newspapers: the purge is Bolshevik in ambition.
Does anybody in their right mind think that Trump will spare the Fedâs Jerome Powell as the two men gear up for an almighty clash over US monetary policy? âCUT INTEREST RATES, JEROME, AND STOP PLAYING POLITICS!â bellowed Trump in capital letters on Truth Social on Friday.
The Fed will indeed cut rates this year but not until it is able to see through the confusing blizzard of tariffs and the ricochet retaliation of an angry world.
Powell told Congress that the tariff shock is much bigger than expected and may set off âpersistentâ inflation rather than just a one-off jump in the price level. He came close to damning Trumponomics as a recipe for low-growth stagflation. That is a red flag to a bull.
The current debate over whether or not Trump has the legal power to fire Powell entirely misunderstands the character of the Maga revolution. Americaâs rule of law is for guidance only these days.
You could say it was ever thus. Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court after it blocked the New Deal. He failed, and unleashed tax investigations to settle scores, as did Richard Nixon. But Trump is an order of magnitude more outrageous.
Powell will not go without a fight. âI will never, ever, ever leave this job voluntarily until my term ends under any circumstances,â he said during Trump 1.0.
Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, said the administration could sideline Powell by appointing a âshadowâ Fed chairman, who could steer the markets by issuing forward guidance. But this does not overcome resistance from the Fed board and the hawkish regional presidents.
A secretive team of Trump loyalists drew up a 10-page report before the election proposing more radical measures. These include forcing the Fed to âalign policy with administration goalsâ or even to make the president an âactingâ member of the Fed board.
Trump could purge members of the seven-strong Fed board one by one until they get the message. The law states that the president can terminate the 14-year term of a Fed governor âfor causeâ, usually meaning malfeasance or neglect.
But Trump has just abused his tariff powers on an heroic scale by invoking fictitious âemergenciesâ. He could no doubt stretch the meaning of âfor causeâ to anything he wants. The Supreme Court has the last say, but Trump-appointed justices have already shown a strong leaning towards an imperial presidency.
In any case, there are other methods to bring the Fed to heel.
Maga vigilantes are intimidating American judges by having pizzas delivered to their homes â a mob tactic to say âwe know where you liveâ. So we can assume that recalcitrant members of the Federal Open Market Committee will face this sort of treatment.
The major US banks are raising their inflation forecasts to 4pc or higher this year. This inflation will hit before the last three price shocks â Covid, the Putin commodity spike and Bidenâs overspending â have faded from immediate memory. It is exactly how inflation psychology becomes embedded.
A variant happened in the 1970s. Nixon bullied the Fed into expansionary policies, with some choice language on âthe myth of the autonomous Fedâ that later surfaced in the Oval Office tapes.
Loose money stoked inflation, so Nixon ordered a freeze on prices and wages in 1971, declaring war on âgougersâ. It was very popular. Illiterate policies often are.
If Trump succeeds in extracting rate cuts from the Fed and tax cuts from Congress, the same problem is going to arise. So my assumption is that he will blame the symptoms and will resort to price controls.
The elephantine difference is that US federal debt was 34pc of GDP in 1971. Today it is 122pc on the Fed measure, and galloping upwards. The fiscal deficit is over 6pc as far as the eye can see.
The US does not have the domestic savings to fund this debt appetite. The savings rate has collapsed to 0.6pc of national income. It was 12pc in the 1960s.
Foreign investors have been plugging the gap. This soaks up a large part of the worldâs savings â the underlying cause of Americaâs trade deficit.
If you think the stock market gyrations of the last few days are terrifying, just wait until Trump destroys the credibility of the Fed and of US treasury debt, the anchor of the global system.
He could order a captive Fed to relaunch quantitative easing and buy the bonds, but to do that when inflation is running hot would be seen by the whole world as naked fiscal dominance. It would set off a price spiral and a collapse of the currency â the sort of outcome seen over the decades in Latin America, or ErdoÄanâs Turkey.
The end destination is a return to US capital controls to stop foreign funds and US investors from taking their money out of America. A man willing to impose 116pc tariffs â including pre-existing ones â on Chinese goods and shut down the biggest bilateral trade relationship in the world as if it were a TV reality show will stop at nothing.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/04/08/trump-sell-off-is-bad-wait-until-wreck-us-bond-market/
The real Adrian Dittmann: An Elon Musk fan in Fiji tricks the world
Did Elon Musk Use His Burner Account to Win MAGA Immigration Feud?
Who Is Adrian Dittmann? Why Some X Users Are Convinced It's Elon Musk
A MAGA âCivil Warâ on X between Musk and the far right over H-1B visas
The online rift over the H-1B skilled-worker visa program signifies a potential wedge between Trumpâs core base and his new Silicon Valley supporters.
Far-right activists clashed online with billionaire Elon Musk and other supporters of President-elect Donald Trump over the need for a skilled-worker immigration program that has long been a lifeblood for Silicon Valley â signifying a potential rift between Trumpâs core nationalist base and technology executives who have come to support him.
The fight that spilled into public view over the holiday week could preview a wedge within Trumpâs coalition over how to execute immigration policy, an issue that animated Trumpâs White House campaign.
The controversy spread across X after far-right activist Laura Loomer on Monday criticized Trumpâs choice to name Sriram Krishnan, a technology entrepreneur and investor who was born in India, as his senior policy adviser on artificial intelligence. She pointed to Krishnanâs previous support for removing some caps on H-1B visas, a program allowing foreigners with technical skills to work in the United States. The policy is âin direct oppositionâ to Trumpâs agenda, Loomer wrote.
The critique ran headlong into tension with some of Trumpâs closest advisers, notably Tesla and SpaceX CEO Musk; David Sacks who will be the president-electâs AI and crypto czar; and Vivek Ramaswamy, who will co-lead a commission to cut government spending. ââNormalcyâ doesnât cut it in a hyper-competitive global market for technical talent,â Ramaswamy said. âAnd if we pretend like it does, weâll have our a--es handed to us by China.â
The
online fight sparked a slew of racist posts from Loomer falsely
describing Indians as âthird world invaders" with low IQs, while saying
it is fueling a âcivil warâ between Trumpâs far-right base and the âtech
brosâ that have come to support his upcoming administration. ...