For about two hours:
Showing posts with label Robert Mugabe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Mugabe. Show all posts
Saturday, September 7, 2019
Monday, March 18, 2019
Just found out my neighbors raise funds to provide clean water in drought stricken Zimbabwe
You know the place, where Robert Mugabe spent 37 years turning it into a Maoist hell after white Rhodesians had turned it into a prosperous exporting nation.
We have terrible water problems right here in Michigan, like in Flint but also in many other places affected by PFOS, but my lunatic Christian home-schooling neighbors decided to help the lunatic fringe communists a continent away instead. They're even going there to run a marathon (!) in celebration of the project.
We are doomed.
Friday, March 2, 2018
South African parliament votes to violate post-apartheid agreements and confiscate white-owned farms without compensation
The story is here.
South African GDP has contracted by a whopping 29% as black radical Marxists have gained the upper hand there since 2011.
The country is following the pattern of neighboring Rhodesia, which willingly embraced Marxist Robert Mugabe in 1980.
Keep letting into America 1 million non-whites a year and the same will happen here.
It's just a matter of time. In South Africa, it took just 24 years.
Keep letting into America 1 million non-whites a year and the same will happen here.
It's just a matter of time. In South Africa, it took just 24 years.
Sunday, September 9, 2012
The Line of the Day Award Goes to "Hope Needs More Time"
The line of the day award goes to the ever-incisive Steve Huntley for The Chicago Sun Times, here:
Hope needs more time. That was President Barack Obama’s message in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention Thursday night. But a country that was forced to live on hope for four years and rewarded with dreary unemployment, falling middle class income and depressed home values may not be ready for another dose of lofty national goals based on nothing more than oratory.
Hope is the very stuff of ideology, whether political or religious.
Religious ideology makes life tolerable by offering faux rewards in the forms of community, sacraments and liturgy with hope of eternal life deferred to the next one. Forgiveness in the here and now goes with all that, a sort of foretaste of the salvation to come. Or it offers assurances of the imminent in-breaking of the kingdom of God with the second coming of Christ, a recrudescent hope which litters the historical landscape since the time of Jesus. Such assurances are often accompanied by religious experiences of being "born again", or of so-called miracles, which require new exempla over time to validate the ideology as the second coming fails to materialize and the experience flattens. Certain Jews say year upon year "Next year, in Jerusalem." Muslims await the last imam, fourteen centuries after Muhammad.
But political ideology promises, promises and promises, with not much to show for it even in democracy, which promptly turns it out when it is still healthy enough to do so. The American record in this regard is mixed. Woodrow Wilson was not turned out. A terrible, costly and demoralizing war was the consequence. FDR was not turned out. Another terrible, costly and demoralizing war was the consequence. But LBJ was turned out, in the throes of a period when first principles were readdressed selfishly under what was decided was an existential threat to the next generation. Say what you will about the '60s generation, war in America stopped being involuntary.
Ideologues sometimes become dictators, in which case they just go on promising. FDR did this but in the extenuating circumstances of global war, flaunting the long-standing American tradition that presidents serve but two terms. A free people finally came to its senses and put a stop to that with the 22nd Amendment, but not until after the fact.
In other times and other places dictators install themselves permanently, as was the case with one Robert Mugabe. Barack Obama has made no secret of his admiration of such like, openly expressing his dissatisfaction with the constraints placed on him by our form of government at the same time he voices his admiration for the lack of such constraints in places such as China. Are Americans wrong to be disquieted by this?
Hope needs more time. But for what, exactly?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)