Democrat solution? Crush everyone, with Medicare for All.
Friday, November 22, 2019
Peggy Noonan must be joking: It was Sondland's third try at truthful sworn testimony and it was completely believable
Gee, just forget then that he perjured himself on the first two attempts?
But NOW you believe him?
What a joke Peggy is. She fits right in.
Here:
It was kind of the ballgame.
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Two months before Trump was elected the Financial Times reported Ukraine's wider political leadership was working to elect Hillary
Politico 1/11/17: Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire: Kiev scrambling to make amends after working to boost Hillary
Democrats colluded with Ukraine to get Paul Manafort and damage Trump and have tried to deflect this ever since by charging Trump colluded with Russia, which is exactly what you would expect to hear from people colluding with Ukraine.
You'll hear more deflection today from British-born Fiona Hill.
Wednesday, November 20, 2019
NYT Nov 5, 2019: Sondland text message in early September to Taylor said president was clear there was no quid pro quo
A crucial witness in the impeachment inquiry reversed himself this week ...
That admission, included in a four-page sworn statement released on Tuesday, directly contradicted his testimony to investigators last month, when he said he “never” thought there was any precondition on the aid. ...
Mr. Sondland had said in a text message exchange in early September with William B. Taylor Jr., the top American diplomat in Ukraine, that the president had been clear there was no quid pro quo between the aid and investigations of the Bidens. But Mr. Sondland testified last month that he was only repeating what Mr. Trump had told him, leaving open the question of whether he believed the president. ...
“I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anticorruption statement,” Mr. Sondland said.
In his closed-door interview last month, Mr. Sondland portrayed himself as a well-meaning and at times unwitting player who was trying to conduct American foreign policy with Ukraine with the full backing of the State Department while Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s lawyer, repeatedly inserted himself at the behest of the president. He also said repeatedly that he could not remember things, including details about the Sept. 1 meeting, according to the 375-page transcript of his testimony.
“And you had never thought there was a precondition to the aid?” one of the Republican investigators asked Mr. Sondland. “Is that correct?”
“Never,” Mr. Sondland said, adding that he “was dismayed when it was held up, but I didn’t know why.”
More here.
Marie Yovanovitch, Obama's US Ambassador to Ukraine, blocked visas for Ukrainian law enforcement in 2018 before Trump fired her in 2019
Ukrainian law enforcement officials believe they have evidence of
wrongdoing by American Democrats and their allies in Kiev, ranging from
2016 election interference to obstructing criminal probes. But, they
say, they’ve been thwarted in trying to get the Trump Justice Department
to act.
Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s
International Legal Cooperation Department, told me he and other senior
law enforcement officials tried unsuccessfully since last year to get
visas from the U.S. Embassy in Kiev to deliver their evidence to
Washington.
“We
were supposed to share this information during a working trip to the
United States,” Kulyk told me in a wide-ranging interview. “However, the
[U.S.] ambassador blocked us from obtaining a visa. She didn’t
explicitly deny our visa, but also didn’t give it to us.”
One
focus of Ukrainian investigators, Kulyk said, has been money spirited
unlawfully out of Ukraine and moved to the United States by businessmen
friendly to the prior, pro-Russia regime of Viktor Yanukovych.
Ukrainian
businessmen “authorized payments for lobbying efforts directed at the
U.S. government,” he told me. “In addition, these payments were made
from funds that were acquired during the money-laundering operation. We
have information that a U.S. company was involved in these payments.”
That company is tied to one or more prominent Democrats, Ukrainian
officials insist.
In another instance, he said, Ukrainian
authorities gathered evidence that money paid to an American Democrat
allegedly was hidden by Ukraine’s National Anti-Corruption Bureau
(NABU) during the 2016 election under pressure from U.S. officials. “In
the course of this investigation, we found that there was a situation
during which influence was exerted on the NABU, so that the name of [the
American] would not be mentioned,” he said.
More here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)