Monday, March 13, 2017
Sunday, March 12, 2017
Judicial overreach: 3-judge panel invalidates 3 Texas congressional districts, 2 Republican, 1 Democrat
Never mind every congressional district in America is a joke.
There is no way one man or one woman can claim to represent the interests of 743,126.4 people, on average, as is the case now countrywide.
Texas has 36 men and women representing nearly 27 million in the US House, but 254 counties. Give Texas 254 seats in the House, and representation would increase to 106,299.2 Texans per member of Congress, on average. Who knows, the members of such a Congress might actually knock on your door every two years.
Do the same with the rest of the country and we could dispense with legislatures redrawing district lines every ten years after every Census, and more importantly with meddling courts trying to interfere in the politics of self-government.
The county system is ancient, venerable and stable. Black counties will have black representatives, Latino counties Latino representatives, and so on, just as it should be.
The time is long past to reform representation in the United States so that we actually get some for a change. Not coincidentally, that's the main impediment to it.
From the story here:
[T]he court ruled that the legislature drew the lines with “the intent and effect of diluting Latino voter opportunity.” ... [T]he court said the legislature used race to draw the lines, packing Democrats into the district and thereby diluting their voting power elsewhere. The court also ruled that the legislature pushed Hispanics into the district in an effort to defeat Doggett if a Hispanic candidate challenged him.
Saturday, March 11, 2017
The Tell: The RNC fundraised me today on the Gorsuch nomination . . .
. . . not on the American Health Care Act.
Always fundraise on the winner.
Friday, March 10, 2017
Year over year additions to full-time jobs in February 2017 were not much better than in 2013
Year-over-year additions to full-time were 1.8 million in February 2017.
In February 2013 1.6 million.
Nothing like 2015's 3 million, 2016's 2.5 million, or even 2014's 2.1 million.
Save your money. You're going to need it.
Mlive: 800,000 lost power in Michigan on Wednesday, two days later more than 615,000 still in the dark
Of those still without power, 515,000 are served by DTE Energy, 100,000 by Consumers Energy.
The story is here.
If the surveillance of Trump was about "financial transactions" (NYT) and "money from the Kremlin" (McClatchy) maybe the Treasury Dept. spearheaded it
I still haven't read anyone saying this.
Instead of obsessing on the FBI, the CIA, the NSA and the DNI, and on the process, maybe journalists ought to be focusing their efforts on the last named agency instead, and the substance.
If it's about the money, the Treasury Dept. might very well have led the investigation for the government of Barack Obama, and the spying.
McClatchy, January 19th, 2017:
The FBI and five other law enforcement and intelligence agencies have collaborated for months in an investigation into Russian attempts to influence the November election, including whether money from the Kremlin covertly aided President-elect Donald Trump, two people familiar with the matter said.
The agencies involved in the inquiry are the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Justice Department, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and representatives of the director of national intelligence, the sources said.
The New York Times, January 19th, 2017:
American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said. ...
The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit.
Justin Raimondo is so close and yet so far:
So the FISA issue is, I believe, a false trail . . ..
Jack Lew has been awfully quiet.
Labels:
Donald Trump 2017,
FBI,
Justin Raimondo,
NYTimes,
Paul Manafort,
spying
Thursday, March 9, 2017
Looks like Obama was a natural born citizen of Kenya after all, according to his half brother
Does this mean that the last eight years are invalidated?
Or did Obama just use this to get cheap tuition as a "foreign" student?
Remember, you can keep your doctor, you can keep your healthcare plan, the ocean levels have begun to recede, our planet is beginning to heal and we are the ones we have been waiting for!
And, to quote Howard Dean, "Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!"
And, to quote Howard Dean, "Yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!"
Rush Limbaugh is wrong, as usual, about Obamacare passing the Senate without 60 votes
Obamacare passed the Senate 60-39 on December 24, 2009 with 58 Democrat and 2 Independent votes (one Republican did not vote, Jim Bunning).
The House passed this bill unchanged March 21, 2010, thus avoiding having to go through the House-Senate conference process and another vote again in each chamber. The bill's elements, if changed, were subject to filibuster back in the Senate because Scott Brown's election to the Senate in the interim on January 19, 2010 foreclosed the possibility of Democrats being able to overcome the 59-41 barrier. 60 votes are required to overcome the filibuster.
Reconciliation was used instead to change only budgetary elements in the bill, which were wanted by the Democrats in the House. For reconciliation purposes, simple majorities only are necessary.
Without a filibuster proof Senate majority, Republicans will be unable to repeal Obamacare.
Their only option is to gut the budgetary elements using their majorities in the House and Senate.
Obamacare will not go away in form until the stars align and Republicans capture 60 seats in the Senate.
It can only go away in practice in the interim by defunding it.
Republicans should re-pass the 2015 repeal legislation, which Obama vetoed, and send it to Trump for his signature as a downpayment.
Update:
Here is the Big Boob on the Right, getting it wrong today:
CALLER: Did the Democrats have 60 when they passed all this? I mean, what the hell?
RUSH: No, the Democrats did not. That’s why they used what’s known as budget reconciliation for many aspects of Obamacare, which was trickery. They didn’t have 60 votes. The Republicans, however, did not have the votes to stop anything at the time.
Update:
Here is the Big Boob on the Right, getting it wrong today:
CALLER: Did the Democrats have 60 when they passed all this? I mean, what the hell?
RUSH: No, the Democrats did not. That’s why they used what’s known as budget reconciliation for many aspects of Obamacare, which was trickery. They didn’t have 60 votes. The Republicans, however, did not have the votes to stop anything at the time.
Labels:
boob,
Donald Trump 2017,
filibuster,
foreclosure,
Obamacare,
Rush Limbaugh 2017
Wednesday, March 8, 2017
Detroit News: Almost 700,000 without power in Michigan according to just two power companies
The story is here.
Here's the Consumers Energy outage map, accounting for only about 194,000 customers who lost power today in the wind storm which gusted as high as 64mph here in Grand Rapids (our power never went out, oddly enough, even though our phone and internet did):
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
William Binney says NSA fingerprints are all over release of Trump phone transcripts with Australia and Mexico
Here:
But Binney did say events such as publication of details of private calls between President Trump and the Australian prime minister, as well as with the Mexican president, are evidence the intelligence community is playing hardball with the White House.
"I think that's what happened here," Binney told Fox. "The evidence of the conversation of the president of the U.S., President Trump, and the [prime minister] of Australia and the president of Mexico. Releasing those conversations. Those are conversations that are picked up by the FAIRVIEW program, primarily, by NSA."
Best news so far from CIA Wikileaks: CIA has cracked encryption like Signal used by Deep State
Every cloud has its silver lining.
From The New York Times, here:
Among other disclosures that, if confirmed, would rock the technology world, the WikiLeaks release said that the C.I.A. and allied intelligence services had managed to bypass encryption on popular phone and messaging services such as Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram. According to the statement from WikiLeaks, government hackers can penetrate Android phones and collect “audio and message traffic before encryption is applied.”
Monday, March 6, 2017
Assuming Clapper's denial that there was a FISA investigation is true, maybe everyone ought to consider they've been had
James Clapper, who lied to Congress about surveillance in the past and was never prosecuted but should be, has stated over the weekend that there was no FISA investigation at all, contrary to the New York Times and everybody else, as reported here:
For the part of the national security apparatus that he oversaw, "there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president, the president-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign," Clapper told Chuck Todd in an exclusive interview on Sunday's "Meet The Press."
So . . ..
Either Clapper is lying again, or there's an alternative explanation.
The New York Times etc. have been reporting a narrative based on anonymous sources, a narrative which derives from the Obama Administration and which it wanted everyone to believe.
I say it's an "Oh look! A deer!" narrative. It was designed to get the bloodhounds off the trail and follow to an inconclusive nowhere.
The real story instead might be that Obama was using the Treasury Dept. to investigate Manafort, giving the FBI, CIA and the NSA the plausible deniability they have asserted. So far Comey and Clapper have denied any spying on Trump.
Well, the Treasury Dept. was involved according to news reports, but so far no one's asked Jack Lew to comment as far as I know.
It was Manafort's financial connections in Ukraine which the Times reported in the summer which caused Manafort to have to bail from the Trump campaign, and Bannon and Conway to be tapped by Trump in August 2016.
The spying on Trump by the Treasury Dept. might have then continued, quite lawfully, endeavoring to uncover evidence of Trump financial wrongdoing in connection with Russia, or some one else, in order to finish him off, but it failed.
Jack Lew served Obama at Treasury to the bitter end.
[T]he Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury shall be under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to audits or investigations, or the issuance of subpenas, which require access to sensitive information concerning— ...
(E) intelligence or counterintelligence matters; or
(F) other matters the disclosure of which would constitute a serious threat to national security or to the protection of any person or property authorized protection by section 3056 of title 18, United States Code, section 3056A of title 18, United States Code, or any provision of the Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1976 (18 U.S.C. 3056 note ; Public Law 94–524).
So . . ..
Either Clapper is lying again, or there's an alternative explanation.
The New York Times etc. have been reporting a narrative based on anonymous sources, a narrative which derives from the Obama Administration and which it wanted everyone to believe.
I say it's an "Oh look! A deer!" narrative. It was designed to get the bloodhounds off the trail and follow to an inconclusive nowhere.
The real story instead might be that Obama was using the Treasury Dept. to investigate Manafort, giving the FBI, CIA and the NSA the plausible deniability they have asserted. So far Comey and Clapper have denied any spying on Trump.
Well, the Treasury Dept. was involved according to news reports, but so far no one's asked Jack Lew to comment as far as I know.
It was Manafort's financial connections in Ukraine which the Times reported in the summer which caused Manafort to have to bail from the Trump campaign, and Bannon and Conway to be tapped by Trump in August 2016.
The spying on Trump by the Treasury Dept. might have then continued, quite lawfully, endeavoring to uncover evidence of Trump financial wrongdoing in connection with Russia, or some one else, in order to finish him off, but it failed.
Jack Lew served Obama at Treasury to the bitter end.
[T]he Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury shall be under the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to audits or investigations, or the issuance of subpenas, which require access to sensitive information concerning— ...
(E) intelligence or counterintelligence matters; or
(F) other matters the disclosure of which would constitute a serious threat to national security or to the protection of any person or property authorized protection by section 3056 of title 18, United States Code, section 3056A of title 18, United States Code, or any provision of the Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1976 (18 U.S.C. 3056 note ; Public Law 94–524).
Labels:
Donald Trump 2017,
FBI,
James Comey,
NBC News,
NYTimes,
Paul Manafort,
spying
Robert Barnes: Obama and his team face jeopardy if they got a FISA warrant by withholding information
From his carefully presented state of the case here at Lawnewz:
and so, third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are then Obama and/or his officials could face serious trouble.
Can a President be charged with a crime? Only once out of office. While in office, impeachment remains the exclusive remedy in order to avoid a single judicial branch trying to overturn an election, such as a grand jury in any part of the country could. Once out of office, a President remains immune from civil liability for his duties while President, under a 1982 decision of the United States Supreme Court. However, as the Nixon pardon attests, nothing forecloses a criminal prosecution of the President after his presidency is complete for crimes against the country. Obama, the Constitutional lawyer, should know that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)