Trump will veto the bill. There aren't enough votes to override. The National Emergency must and will continue! There's another election coming you fool.
Friday, March 8, 2019
Trump used immigration to distinguish himself from the rest and get elected: It was merely a political tool then as it is now
Wake up and smell the coffee, served up fresh and hot by Juan Valdez you idiots. You are so owned.
Thursday, March 7, 2019
ANYBODY who runs for president now as a Democrat is an anti-Semite
How quickly they drop out now is an index of their disagreement with the Democrat Party's new embrace of anti-Semitism.
Way to go, Sherrod Brownie! Didn't take you even one day!
The New York Times' Paul Krugman: No anti-Semitic enemies to the left, only to the right!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
What a douche bag, writing for a douche rag.
Contra Dan Henninger of the WSJ, this is hardly the hottest job market in half a century when Obama's was actually better, which ain't sayin' much
This past weekend, The Wall Street Journal published a series of stories titled “Inside the Hottest Job Market in Half a Century.” As far as I’m concerned, this jobs record is the story of the year. The Journal’s articles transformed a year of economic data into the new daily reality of getting paid to work in America. ... It requires a remarkable degree of obtuseness to stare at the policy success of the past two years and pretend it hasn’t happened. Democrats are doing exactly that. Conservatives should pocket the Trump presidency’s Reaganesque policies for massively matching job producers with job seekers.
There's nothing obtuse about the facts, which show that the current job recovery is nothing out of the ordinary and simply continues the recovery which began despite Obama. The fact is that since the election of Trump in 2016 there's actually been a slow down in the rate of job growth compared with the immediately preceding, more robust period from 2013-2016.
Reaganesque policy under Trump hasn't produced a better outcome for job growth compared with that period, which was the immediate result of the John Boehner-Barack Obama deal to make the Bush tax cuts permanent starting in 2013.
For all the bluster by Trump-aligned organs in the media, especially at The Wall Street Journal, Fox and on talk radio, Trump's results so far also haven't come close to matching the pre-2000 era of job creation.
The economy shrank after the end of the 20th century, and we're still trying to recover to the former glory, nineteen years later.
So far, no one has a solution. Short of a giant spending cut and an actual structural commitment to onshoring instead of offshoring, there will not be one.
Repeal the 22nd Amendment, 2019 edition
Limiting the president to two terms when House and Senate members are not so limited increases the political power of the legislative over the executive, contrary to the founders' vision of separated and balanced powers. The executive is automatically lame on reelection as a consequence, and the Congress knows it and exploits it.
The growth of the so-called "imperial presidency" in the post-war has been simply a response to this infringement on the executive. To be sure the individual responses of the executive often become offenses in and of themselves, but nothing has been more offensive in the history of the Republic than Congress' sorry record of unimpeded theft of the American people's money and its headlong leap into the spending abyss.
Like guilty dogs caught peeing on the carpet of the Constitution, the Congress occasionally bows its head and cedes a little power back to the executive in one form or another, the latest example on display being the National Emergencies Act of 1976. With that the Congress is quite content to let the executive take all the political heat for making the difficult decisions in extremis while posturing as defenders of the Constitution. They win both ways, and the president loses. Congress' incumbents know they'll be back for the long run, but the president won't.
Repealing the 22nd Amendment would actually put more of the onus on Congress these poseurs to do their damn job for a change instead of dumping it all on one person while crying "Tyranny!" after he acts to clean up their puddle. And that's why it won't happen.
But it still should.
Why Twitter is better than Facebook
Facebook makes you go to all the trouble of unfriending people for what they believe whereas Twitter saves you a step by automatically unfriending you for that. Much more efficient.
I just hate committing suicide with alcohol
I always wake up the next morning with the worst headache.
Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Democrat Ron Wyden is tired of James Clappers' lies, which were like what, in 2013 . . . 6 light years ago
Expect Ron Wyden to make a statement on the 2019 capture of the Democrat Party by the anti-Semites in . . . 2025.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)