Tuesday, June 13, 2023

Permanently higher prices for the basics looks to be the future

 The simple egg is now 25% more expensive at Sam's Club compared with pre-Covid. I used to pay routinely $3.98 for two dozen like those shown below. Prices nationally have fallen only to the unusually high levels of 2015.

Whole chicken is up 23%, electricity 18%, and both appear to be stable or rising.

Avian flu is now only sporadic.

 






Core CPI inflation in the United States in May at 5.32% year-over-year has hardly come down from 5.58% in January

 



I remember when the orgies at the White House were at least kept indoors

 


The 47% is back

 


Nature has a self-cleansing mechanism

 


In 15 years we've gone from Obamagirl to a topless Biden girlyman at the White House

.

 
.

Monday, June 12, 2023

My local utility has repriced my fixed monthly payment for natural gas and electricity for the next year


 The new price is down 30% from last year's horrendous price.

The monthly payment will now resemble the high end of normal I experienced in the years prior to the Russia-Ukraine War.

Like a boot off my neck.

Sunday, June 11, 2023

Today's up-is-down headlines: UK Daily Mail v CNBC, Drudge v Real Clear

 'LOW ENERGY' TRUMP SPEECH (Drudge)

Trump Delivers Fiery Speech in Georgia: "They're Coming After You" (Real Clear Politics)

Nemesis is coming, Draco is coming

 


Lolbertarian says the worst possible thing which could happen to the economy (i.e. "to me") is higher future taxes


More self-absorbed than your average tranny.

Scott Sumner, here:

The consequence of the reckless fiscal policy will not be a financial crisis. Nor will it be a default. Even the permanent monetization of the debt is unlikely, in my view. The most likely consequence will be higher future taxes and slower economic growth. This will lead to reduced living standards. It might also push politics in a more “populist” direction, with consequences that are difficult to predict (but unlikely to be desirable.)



Trump is toast

 


Trump’s Former AG Bill Barr Lowers the Boom in Stunning Analysis on Fox News Sunday: ‘If Even Half of it is True, He is Toast’


Thursday, June 8, 2023

Bob and Doug BBQ goes slightly amiss, Canada wildfires consume the equivalent of Maryland and more

 


The Supremes still don't have the courage to void the tyrannical, unequal, racist, Northern neo-reconstructionism of the 1965 Voting Rights Act in the American South

 The Supremes are not colorblind and are as reprehensible in this as any college or business using racial quotas to exclude whites and Asians in favor of less qualified people of color, and they know it.

American liberalism is nothing if not hypocritical.


Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, both conservatives, joined the court's three liberals in the majority.

In doing so, the court — which has a 6-3 conservative majority — turned away the state’s effort to make it harder to remedy concerns raised by civil rights advocates that the power of Black voters in states like Alabama is being diluted by dividing voters into districts where white voters dominate.

In Thursday’s ruling, Roberts, writing for the majority, said a lower court had correctly concluded that the congressional map violated the voting rights law.

He wrote that there are genuine fears that the Voting Rights Act “may impermissibly elevate race in the allocation of political power” and that the Alabama ruling “does not diminish or disregard those concerns."

The court instead “simply holds that a faithful application of our precedents and a fair reading of the record before us do not bear them out here,” Roberts added.

As such, the court left open future challenges to the law, with Kavanaugh writing in a separate opinion that his vote did not rule out challenges to Section 2 based on whether there is a time at which the 1965 law's authorization of the consideration of race in redistricting is no longer justified.

More.