Not about Bush . . .
But about Obama:
Obama can be a strangely passive president. There are a startling number of occasions in which the president has been missing in action - unwilling, reluctant or late to weigh in on the issue of the moment. ...
Each of these instances can be explained on its own terms, as matters of legislative strategy, geopolitical calculation or political prudence. ...
Yet the dots connect to form an unsettling portrait of a "Where's Waldo?" presidency: You frequently have to squint to find the White House amid the larger landscape. ...
[T]he White House - much to the frustration of some congressional Democrats - has been unclear in public and private about what cuts would and would not be acceptable. ...
Obama seems more the passive bystander to negotiations between the House and Senate than the chief executive leading his party. ...
Hum. Passive, startlingly missing in action, unwilling, reluctant, late . . . and unclear, a bystander . . . all that from a sympathetic liberal supporter, an honest observer, who can't quite put her finger on the problem.
You would think someone born even in 1958 could theorize psychotic effects of THC overexposure when she sees them.
Just why is it again that Obama keeps his medical records sealed? And why is it that so-called journalists just don't seem to want to know?
Come on, Ruth. You might even get that Pulletsurprise after all.
Just why is it again that Obama keeps his medical records sealed? And why is it that so-called journalists just don't seem to want to know?
Come on, Ruth. You might even get that Pulletsurprise after all.
