The story is here.
Justice Antonin Scalia, who dissented here, called it "perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our Nation's history":
Today the Court affirms what is perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our Nation's history: an order requiring California to release the staggering number of 46,000 convicted criminals.
What? Roe v. Wade, which resulted in the deaths of millions of innocents, was less radical? Overturning millennia of marriage law and the statutes of 30 states was less radical? Obliging people to engage in health insurance commerce was not a repudiation of centuries of contract law?
Antonin Scalia was right to dissent in this one, but come on, Solomon he was not.