Sunday, August 25, 2024

The sometimes in the subhead means there are other times, like when he's doing the nanny and getting her pregnant, then he's just the rogue sex symbol

How does Rampell write this stuff without heavy medication of some kind?

 


British Karen of the kitchen wants to cancel your refrigerator

 But she lives in LA, safely tucked far away from the consequences of the likes of cancel king Keir Starmer.



ABC's Jon Karl pretends that Kamala Harris wasn't for ending private health insurance and that she's changed her position despite zero evidence of that

 




Tim Mind Your Own Damn Business Walz succeeded in funding a program in Minnesota which threatens to create a hate speech registry


 

Gov. Tim Walz’s original budget proposal for the human rights department included funding for the work: $395,000 in fiscal year 2024 and $250,000 annually after that to report on criminal and non-criminal “discrimination and hate incidents” statewide.

More.

I mean, what are the chances, right?

 


Kamala Harris is as phony about health care choice as the day is long, every position in the campaign requires the jabs

 



The value of US Treasury securities in foreign hands made a new record high in June 2024 at $8.21 trillion

 

click to expand

Elect Harris and we'll be next, no kidding

 


Remember that Kamala Harris went with her gut in picking the chronically mendacious Tim Walz: I really like him, she said

 “He’s just so open,” Ms. Harris marveled privately after her meeting with Mr. Walz, according to one person with knowledge of her comments. “I really like him.”

The leaker probably comes from this group:

The questioners included Marty Walsh, who had served as Mr. Biden’s labor secretary; Mr. [Cedric] Richmond, a campaign co-chair; Tony West, Ms. Harris’s brother-in-law; Dana Remus, a former White House counsel; and Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada.

My guess is the brother-in-law, or Cedric Richmond:

“She wanted someone who understood the role, someone she had a connection with and someone who brought contrast to the ticket,” said Cedric Richmond, a former White House adviser who was part of Ms. Harris’s selection team.

In the end, General Harris picked the soldier who would obey orders:

In contrast, Ms. Harris would later describe Mr. Walz — who explicitly told her not to pick him if he could not help her win — as “joyful” and willing to do anything for the team.

-- The New York Times, August 6, 2024

 

 


 

Friday, August 23, 2024

Democrats still have not learned the Revulsion Election lesson of 2016

 


It's true: Kamala Harris fought hard for seniors facing elder abuse


 
 
Kamala Harris fought hard for seniors facing elder abuse, so hard she found a way to push an old man suffering from severe cognitive decline out of public office where he was the target of constant ridicule.
 
Make sure you vote for her Nov 5, since no one did in the spring.

LOL Harris said she fought for seniors facing elder abuse, and won only because police finally disarmed Hunter Biden after a years-long investigation

 


Ordinarily in a democracy the people get to vote for their candidate, but who needs votes when we've got military dictator General Harris?

 


Kamala, the beneficiary of a party which just tossed the votes of 14 million for Joe Biden in the primaries in the dumpster, accuses Trump of trying to throw away votes



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donald Trump tried to throw away your votes.

I thought Democrats were going to be about moving forward instead of about re-litigating 2020?

I thought they were about joy?

 



Kamala the confused: Trump is both unserious and a serious threat

 Pick one!

 
Methinks she doth protest too much. 

Thursday, August 22, 2024

This conservative outrage machine story yesterday and today about Commerce Secretary Raimondo has got to be the dumbest one I've heard in a long time

 She was asked an ignorant question.

Why would the Commerce Secretary have something timely to say about employment revisions released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the Labor Department?

It's not her area. I wouldn't expect her to know anything about it, and if I had a brain I wouldn't bother asking her.

Commerce and Labor are two separate cabinet level departments and have been since 1913.

I don't expect the Commerce Secretary to have the latest labor information anymore than I expect the Labor Secretary to be able to respond to the latest GDP report produced by the BEA at the Commerce Dept.

But all the ignorami on the right, but I repeat myself, are up in arms over this. It's embarrassing.

What's really going on here is outrage over the size of the revision, which is the largest since 2009.

Republicans want to say Biden and Harris have been lying about the jobs numbers for a year to make themselves look better.

That's a crock. The initial benchmark revisions occur every year around this time, and their size should be no surprise since the Employment Situation Summary every month contains revisions upon revisions upon revisions of prior months. This happens all the time, and if you know you know that this year the numbers have been particularly susceptible of large revisions, criticism, and expressed suspicions from the FOMC members on down.

But total nonfarm payrolls have always been this way. They are quick and dirty on any day. I gave up following them in favor of other measures precisely because it involves securing jello on a galley plate in high seas, and I have better things to do.

Full time employment, measured with other data, around 50% of population under Joe Biden hasn't been great, and it hasn't been awful either. In my arrogant opinion, following total nonfarm and its endless stream of revisions is a fool's errand.

Even more foolish to get upset about it when plenty of other indicators show that employment up until this summer has been "secularly tight", as one economist likes to put it. Continued claims for unemployment have been steady as she goes since late 2021.

The slight recent elevation in these claims numbers is consistent with a softening of employment, which I have noted elsewhere in regard to full time jobs.

The bloom is off the rose it seems, but the preliminary total nonfarm benchmark revision down 819,000 is a problem with that model, not a sign of a sudden problem with employment.